Supreme Court Upheld Increment Benefit to Retired Daily-Wage Employees.
⚖️Case Study: Increment Benefit to Retired Daily-Wage Employees 📌Case Title: Chhaganbhai Khoyabhai Pateliya & Others v. State of Gujarat &…
Author: admin
“Dignity Over Labels: Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under PITA in Rani Pratap Singh v. State of Maharashtra”
⚖️Case Study Summary: Rani Pratap Singh v. The State of Maharashtra|CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 461 OF 2015|Decided on 01.10.2026. 1.…
The Taxable Event Is The Supply, And The Incidence Of Taxation Is Determined By The Form Of The Good At The Time Of Sale, Not Its Subsequent End Use-SC.
⚖️Case Study: Addl. Commr. Commercial Tax & Ors. v. Cadila Health Care Ltd. & Anr. Civil Appeal Nos. 9788-9789 of…
Severe physical illness or paralysis does not automatically invalidate a testator’s mental capacity unless cognitive impairment is firmly established by medical evidence-Bombay High Court.
⚖️Case Study: Rajkumar Assudomal Gurbani v. Vijay Gulab Gurbani & Anr. 📌Case No. : TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 74 OF 2006.…
Advocates’ Professional Misconduct and Criminal Contempt
⚖️Case Study: Criminal Contempt Reference No. 1 of 2022 🏛️Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench 📌Coram: Urmila…
Unraveling the Case Diary: A Study of Delhi High Court’s Verdict in the case of Rakesh vs. State (2010)
⚖️Case Study: Rakesh vs. State (along with connected appeals: Rajneesh vs. State and Lal Mohammad vs. State) 1. Factual Background…
Whether notices u/s. 35(3) of the BNSS, 2023 must be mandatorily issued in all cases involving offences punishable with imprisonment of up to 7 years?-SC Clarifies
⚖️Case Study: Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation |2026 INSC 115. 1. Case Profile 2. Factual and Legal…
DNA Match Alone Not Enough-SC Affirms Aquittal.
⚖️Case Study: State of Himachal Pradesh v. Anchla @ Chanchla 📌Criminal Appeal No. 166 of 2019 | 2026 INSC 1074…
Appeal or Civil Suit? Bombay High Court Clarifies Section 143 MLRC Remidies.
⚖️Case Study: Dipak Chandrabhan Gadhade/Gavande v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 📌2026:BHC-AUG:6216 | Civil Revision Application No. 196 of 2025🏛️Bombay…
There cannot be partial rejection of the evidence of the prosecutrix for the purpose of Section 366 IPC and partial acceptance of the very same statement for the purpose of proving the charge under Section 376 IPC-SC.
⚖️Legal Case Study 📜Factual Matrix & Procedural History 🧩Legal Issues Addressed by the Supreme Court 📋Reasoning and Judgment of the…